Potassium-Argon Dating Potassium-Argon dating is the only viable technique for dating very old archaeological materials. Geologists have used this method to date rocks as much as 4 billion years old. It is based on the fact that some of the radioactive isotope of Potassium, Potassium K ,decays to the gas Argon as Argon Ar By comparing the proportion of K to Ar in a sample of volcanic rock, and knowing the decay rate of K, the date that the rock formed can be determined. How Does the Reaction Work? Potassium K is one of the most abundant elements in the Earth’s crust 2. One out of every 10, Potassium atoms is radioactive Potassium K These each have 19 protons and 21 neutrons in their nucleus.
K-ar dating problems
Potassium-argon dating , method of determining the time of origin of rocks by measuring the ratio of radioactive argon to radioactive potassium in the rock. This dating method is based upon the decay of radioactive potassium to radioactive argon in minerals and rocks; potassium also decays to calcium Thus, the ratio of argon and potassium and radiogenic calcium to potassium in a mineral or rock is a measure of the age of the sample.
The calcium-potassium age method is seldom used, however, because of the great abundance of nonradiogenic calcium in minerals or rocks, which masks the presence of radiogenic calcium. On the other hand, the abundance of argon in the Earth is relatively small because of its escape to the atmosphere during processes associated with volcanism.
All radiometric dating methods have the same problems. K-Ar dates are unreliable and cherry-picked.
If the address matches an existing account you will receive an email with instructions to reset your password. If the address matches an existing account you will receive an email with instructions to retrieve your username. We review the in situ geochronology experiments conducted by the Mars Science Laboratory mission’s Curiosity rover to understand when the Gale Crater rocks formed, underwent alteration, and became exposed to cosmogenic radiation.
The sedimentary rocks underwent fluid-moderated alteration 2 Gyr later, which may mark the closure of aqueous activity at Gale Crater. Over the past several million years, wind-driven processes have dominated, denuding the surfaces by scarp retreat. The Curiosity measurements validate radiometric dating techniques on Mars and guide the way for future instrumentation to make more precise measurements that will further our understanding of the geological and astrobiological history of the planet.
The Mars Science Laboratory mission is exploring an astrobiologically relevant ancient environment on Mars to decipher its geological processes and history, including an assessment of past habitability. The search for life in the Solar System depends on discovering the right moments in planetary evolution—when habitable environments existed, when they declined, and when geological processes operated to preserve traces of life after death.
However, the relative martian chronology derived from stratigraphy is not yet tied to an absolute chronology. The existing understanding of martian chronology is based primarily on crater density and analogy with the Moon, under the assumptions that the lunar cratering history is well constrained and that the martian flux rates can be derived from the lunar rate. However, the relative cratering rate between the Moon and Mars is far from established; the lunar crater record itself conveys a roughly billion-year uncertainty during the Hesperian, and additionally the martian impact flux could have ranged from the same as the Moon to up to five times higher Robbins, ; Bottke and Norman, Confounding variables that contribute to the uncertainties associated with dating by crater density on Mars range from the contributions of persistent volcanism McEwen et al.
Absolute ages of martian surface units are, therefore, uncertain—a factor of two or more on older surfaces Hartmann and Neukum, , and disagreements can be an order of magnitude or more on younger, lightly cratered surfaces Swindle et al.
The technique uses a few key assumptions that are not always true. These assumptions are:. Assumption 2 can cause problems when analysing certain minerals, especially a mineral called sanidine. This is a kind of K-rich feldspar that forms at high temperatures and has a very disordered crystal lattice. This disordered crystal lattice makes it more difficult for Ar to diffuse out of the sample during analysis, and the high melting temperature makes it difficult to completely melt the sample to release the all of the gas.
The 40Ar/39Ar isotopic dating technique is a variant of the conventional K–Ar techniques because of its applicability to a broad range of geologic problems.
I have just completed the data reduction on a low potassium basalt from the Medicine Lake, California, the basalt of Tionesta. The recent development of small volume low-background noble gas extraction systems and low-background high-sensitivity mass spectrometers have improved our ability to more accurately and precisely date geologic events. However, the dating of Quaternary, low potassium rocks continues to test the limits of the method because of small quantities of radiogenic argon and large atmospheric argon contamination.
In these early studies the vertical succession of sedimentary rocks and structures were used to date geologic units and events relatively. In addition, faunal succession and the use of “key” diagnostic fossils were used to correlate lithologic units over wide geographic areas. Although lithologic units could be placed within a known sequence of geologic periods of roughly similar age, absolute ages, expressed in units of years, could not be assigned. Until the twentieth century geologists were limited to these relative dating methods.
For a complete discussion on the development of the Geologic time scale see Berry, Following the discovery of radioactivity by Becquerel a,b,c near the end of the nineteenth century, the possibility of using this phenomenon as a means for determining the age of uranium-bearing minerals was demonstrated by Rutherford In his study Rutherford measured the U and He He is an intermediate decay product of U contents of uranium-bearing minerals to calculate an age.
One year later Boltwood developed the chemical U-Pb method. These first “geochronology studies” yielded the first absolute ages from geologic material and indicated that parts of the Earth’s crust were hundreds of millions of years old. During this same period of time Thomson and Campbell and Wood demonstrated that potassium was radioactive and emitted beta-particles.
The Problem of Contamination in Obtaining Accurate Dates of Young Geologic Rocks
Radiometric Dating Methods. Table of Contents. Peru’s Fossil Whales. Cosmogenic Isotope Dating. Himalayas 10 times younger than previously thought? Circular Calibration Methods. Fission Track Dating. History of Radiometric Dating.
In this article we shall examine the basis of the K-Ar dating method, how it works, and what can go wrong with it. It is possible to measure the proportion in which 40 K decays, and to say that about Potassium is chemically incorporated into common minerals, notably hornblende , biotite and potassium feldspar , which are component minerals of igneous rocks. Argon, on the other hand, is an inert gas; it cannot combine chemically with anything.
Potassium-Argon dating has the advantage that the argon is an inert gas that does not react chemically and would not be expected to be included in the solidification of a rock, so any found inside a rock is very likely the result of radioactive decay of potassium. Since the argon will escape if the rock is melted, the dates obtained are to the last molten time for the rock. Since potassium is a constituent of many common minerals and occurs with a tiny fraction of radioactive potassium, it finds wide application in the dating of mineral deposits.
The feldspars are the most abundant minerals on the Earth, and potassium is a constituent of orthoclase , one common form of feldspar. Potassium occurs naturally as three isotopes. The radioactive potassium decays by two modes, by beta decay to 40 Ca and by electron capture to 40 Ar. There is also a tiny fraction of the decay to 40 Ar that occurs by positron emission. The calcium pathway is not often used for dating since there is such an abundance of calcium in minerals, but there are some special cases where it is useful.
The decay constant for the decay to 40 Ar is 5. Even though the decay of 40 K is somewhat complex with the decay to 40 Ca and three pathways to 40 Ar, Dalrymple and Lanphere point out that potassium-argon dating was being used to address significant geological problems by the mid ‘s. The energy-level diagram below is based on data accumulated by McDougall and Harrison. For a radioactive decay which produces a single final product, the decay time can be calculated from the amounts of the parent and daughter product by.
Subscribe to RSS
O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called: Which some professing have erred concerning the faith. For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own belly; and by good words and fair speeches deceive the hearts of the simple. Lies of Evolution: K-Ar Dating.
Author: Christopher J.
Radiometric dating of rocks and minerals using naturally occurring, long-lived radioactive isotopes is troublesome for young-earth creationists because the techniques have provided overwhelming evidence of the antiquity of the earth and life. Some so-called creation scientists have attempted to show that radiometric dating does not work on theoretical grounds for example, Arndts and Overn ; Gill but such attempts invariably have fatal flaws see Dalrymple ; York and Dalrymple Other creationists have focused on instances in which radiometric dating seems to yield incorrect results.
In most instances, these efforts are flawed because the authors have misunderstood or misrepresented the data they attempt to analyze for example, Woodmorappe ; Morris HM ; Morris JD Only rarely does a creationist actually find an incorrect radiometric result Austin ; Rugg and Austin that has not already been revealed and discussed in the scientific literature. The creationist approach of focusing on examples where radiometric dating yields incorrect results is a curious one for two reasons.
First, it provides no evidence whatsoever to support their claim that the earth is very young. If the earth were only —10 years old, then surely there should be some scientific evidence to confirm that hypothesis; yet the creationists have produced not a shred of it so far. Where are the data and age calculations that result in a consistent set of ages for all rocks on earth, as well as those from the moon and the meteorites, no greater than 10 years?
Glaringly absent, it seems. Second, it is an approach doomed to failure at the outset. Creationists seem to think that a few examples of incorrect radiometric ages invalidate all of the results of radiometric dating, but such a conclusion is illogical. Even things that work well do not work well all of the time and under all circumstances. Try, for example, wearing a watch that is not waterproof while swimming.